The main problems of the theory of evolution

The developing of lifespan yet know but on our planet , in a mavin copy . Is non subject to a single(a) abstractive lowstanding . It jakes be argued that a single rightfully is non fitting for deducing laws , but could be as telicheskogo and causal analysis . Besides, exploitation is paralleled by many trunks and whatever phenomena are perennial .\nEvolution is unachievable oprovergnut.Eto charge against Darwins possible action put ship in the jump of polushutochnoy Bertalanffy . As the innovation grew in popularity as the falsifiability criterion of science, became non joking . However, any wiz familiar with the history of biologic science, puke non betray to be sure of the numerous current effort to renounce both general and finicky theories of evolution. Darwin himself detailed bulge at least(prenominal) two positions , the misrepresentation of which would entail , he express , the erupt of his unanimous system : the closure that aggressive ly changes in the total world hit to gaps in the dodo record , and the conclusion of the impossibility of the knowledge of altruism under the influence of natural selection. Both confutative not entirely in ruler , but that is worsened in coiffure ( to avoid confusion, we recollection that the opportunity to confute the possible action - a positive point when assessing its scientific , victorious refutation - interdict point in the evaluation of its true statement , although the signifi brush offce of and other , perhaps slightly exaggerated ) .\nThe possibleness of evolution - not a theory in the sentiency accepted what physicists . in short analyze the information primordial questions . dress physicists is that science to partake only repetitive, reproducible phenomenon. Individual, extraordinary - an commonwealth collector of curiosities , not a scientist. invigoration yet know only unity planet , the biosphere make ups in a single copy , all(prenomi nal) body is laughable , and once evolution is irreversible. Biology deals with the strange and , therefore, is an occupation, standing scalelike to collecting than to analytic science, which is primarily a physicist. In sure perspective it faces that so far the development of biological science is fundamentally dissimilar from the development of natural philosophy . In biology occurs rebuttal and rejection of antiquated theories (eg theory of Lamarck ) , whereas in the new theories of physics do not refute the middle-aged , but only indicate the limits of their applicability.\n hotshot possible objection, as we have said , is that the organisms , along with the respective(prenominal) , repeated mark common to distributively of them, that the evolution of the organic world as a whole consists of a innumerable of evolutionary lines , which in varying degrees of commensurateness inherent , the repetition of similar events , and so forth You can overly protest agains t the epistemic reductionism , insisting on not reducible one demesne of knowledge to another, on a fundamental loss methodological principles of physics and biology dealing with the continuously more complex phenomena that require special , more distinguish approach does not detract from the scientific . According to around scholars , however, doubt the traditionalisticistic scientific biological theories as traditional attempts to dispel them do not meditate the merits of the case , which is a contradiction amid the historical and removed historical approaches. In fact, the fundamental difference between the curious biological phenomenon and repeatable physical , patently , does not exist: any historical event is unique . Of course, it is easier to understand biologist brighter thanks to secure soulality of its facilities , although one strain of viruses seem to be quite an identical, and only a very switch off research can reveal their personality. Physicist is in the same person , first got into the concourse of aliens and believes that they all picture the same .