Thomas Becket vs Henry II :: European Europe History

Thomas Becket vs Henry IIThe High Middle Ages was a time of power struggles between the perform and the State. Increases in royal power and expeditions like the Crusades symbolized the teeter-totter of the balance of power between the ii foundations, and a prime example of the fight for power is the troth of Henry II, King of England, and Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. Henry II gained his throne thanks to the efforts of his mother, who fought to maintain her familys stature in the royal family tree. Thomas Becket was the son of a laden London merchant, and lived a life of no worries. Theobald, the Archbishop of Canterbury at the time, recognized Beckets intelligence, and he was put under Theobalds church tree. There, Becket gained experience and serious attention from his great successes as the Archbishops trusty servant, and King Henry II laid an eye on him also. Seeing Beckets potential intelligence, Henry II appointed Becket to the position of Chancellor of England. In England, the Chancellor was second-in-command only to the King. Any man of this stature was given great power, and any man placed in this position must be capable to match his expectations. Henrys instincts were accurate, and Becket performed amazingly at his new position. He revolutionized how Englands government was run, and turned the quiet castle into a busy place of work. Beckets fame rose instantly, gaining attention from whole over England, and quickly gained the reputation of being Henrys greatest loyal worker. Becket, aside from being Henrys most trustworthy servant, also became Henrys greatest friend. Henry frequently visited Becket for dinner, and the two would discuss issues and exchange ideas almost every night. Henry was able to derive one conclusion from their dinner sessions Thomas Becket was the most intelligent man in all of England. At this point in time, the Church and State of England fought mainly for power over the judicial system of England. Henry II cu te to obligate common law in his country, a system of justice with a jury that accuses suspects and royal judges that determine the sentence on the criminals. The Church, headed by the archbishop of Canterbury, wanted to keep their traditional system of canon law. The huge flaw in canon law was apparent to all of England, but the church was not volition to back down to the State. In the churchs court system, the two greatest concerns were the immunity granted to church officials and the immunity granted to those who sought sanctuary.