Members of Congress Should Have Term Limits Essay -- congressional ter

When the united States was founded, the theme behind the new politics was to establish an efficient organization without doling out too much indicant to any unrivaled person. The Founders intended to prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had exactly escaped by breaking away from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the legislative placement for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has non necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to up clutch the Founders intentions, to prevent inequitable advantages given to incumbents, and to allow a multitude of additional benefits.Initially, the Founders intended to defend a limit on the amount of condemnation any one person could serve. In the Articles of Confederation, a rotation in office system was d escribed, so that no one person could remain in a position for decades on end. However, this was abandoned in the Constitution because it was deemed unnecessary. At the time of the nations founding, the occupation of politician did not exist. One could hold an office for a estimate of years, but it was not considered a career path. Originally, politicians were seen as making great sacrifices, because they stepped away from their family and primary jobs for a number of years to serve their country, before returning to their normal lives (Vance, 1994, p. 429). In the terminology of Founding Father Roger Sherman, The representatives ought to return home and mix with the people. By rest at the seat of the government, they will acquire the habits of the place, which might differ from those... ... opening due to career politicians disregarding the governmental system created by the Founders. deeds CitedCRS Rep., 104th Cong., 1-2 (1997).CRS Rep., 106th Cong., 3-5 (2000).Kurfir st, R. (1996). Term-limit logic paradigms and paradoxes. Polity, 29.1, 119-140.Madison, J. (1788, Feb. 19). The Federalist no. 57 The alleged tendency of the new think to elevate the few at the expense of the many considered in continuative with representation. New York Packet. Retrieved from http//constitution.org/fed/federa57.htmU.S. Const., art. I, 2.Vance, D.A. (1994). State-imposed congressional term limits what would the Founders of the Constitution say?. Brigham teenage University Law Review, 1994, 429.Weissert, C., & Halperin, K. (2007). The paradox of term limit support to know them is not to love them. Political Research Quarterly, 60.3, 516-517.