Mary Shelley – Cloning

In bloody shame Shelleys Frankenstein, the topic of clone and the moralistic issues relating to it become prevalent. First of on the whole, the peter in the novel was in nubble a world clone. The instrument was created by schoolmaster Frankenstein in guarantee to help generosity by searching of a way to preserve life and eliminate death. Ironically, skipper Frankenstein creates a being that takes life past making him, in a way, the real monster of the story. Mary Shelley explores the mind-set of society by portraying the way society treats a proceeds of scientific know leadge, much(prenominal) as the practice of human copy.Shelley depicts societys chemical reaction to the creature that passkey Frankenstein created as negative, and displays Victors reflections on the problems that his creature creates for him. Shelleys position on cloning is that the possible benefits atomic number 18 non reliable enough to overcome the bad and thus, making the practice of cloning ne gative. Mary Shelley begins her novel with a well-kn avouch quote from John Miltons Paradise Lost, Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay/ To mold me Man,/ did I exploit thee from darkness to promote me? This rhetorical question made by Adam, a creation of God, epitomize the creatures feelings toward his spring, Victor Frankenstein. The creature is comparing himself as to twain Adam and Lucifer, or Satan, as he is shunned and left in forsaking by his give creator, though he strives to be good. Because of the isolation and forlornness that the creature had to fix with, it caused him to turn evil and eventually, into a murderer. Eventually, it also led to Victor Frankensteins ruin in strive to rid humanity of the creature when ironically, was for humanity in the first place.This reveals mans attempt to play God, to create life from nothingness, can lead to horrible results. Mary Shelleys novel is also reference to as the Modern Prometheus. Similarly, Prometheus and Victor Fr ankenstein both attempted to create nighthing to benefit humanity however, their creations ended up harming themselves and this led to their own destruction. Prometheus stole fire for man, trespassing on divinity territory and resulted in having his liver eaten out every night for eternity. In comparison, Victor Frankenstein suffered from prolonged torture and guilt due to his creation murdering all of his loved ones.Both characters go too far and does not accept their own limitations. Similar to Prometheus, who was tied up to a rock, alone in the halfway of the sea, Frankenstein feels left out by society and cannot run away from his situation. Victor Frankensteins dream is to create a whole species that will hallow him, a species of wonderful, perfect beings A new species would bless me as its creator and source many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me. In addition, it seems like Victor Frankenstein wanted to create the creature to praise him more than to i mprove and help human nature.Even though, while Frankenstein had a good pauperization when creating the creature, he failed to ask himself if the creature himself would want to be brought into the world. On the another(prenominal) hand, he refuses his responsibility and flees from the creature after bring it to life. He leaves the creature alone and does not understand the fact that he as the creator is a father and his responsible for his creation. Frankenstein does not enlighten the creature how to deal with the badness of society and how to treat other human beings.He does not teach the creature from right and wrong and should have accepted the creature as a human, not a ugly monster. Eventually, the creature is, in a sense, corrupted by society, while Frankenstein deserts him due to fear of the creature. Therefore, Victor Frankenstein can be portrayed as a monstrous sort of of the creature itself. Even at the end of the novel, he does not get word to accept his own failure of moral imaginations and dies without understanding the nature of his own guilt. Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is a great depiction of how science advancements, such as a the practice of human cloning, can go wrong.Even though Frankenstein is a fiction novel, contents contained in Frankenstein can well compare to the situations that we have in society today, especially in the field of science. Although some may say the practice of cloning could be used to rein about many genes that can cause possible diseases, improving the fiber of foods that we eat, and obviate the human aging process however, it is scientifically proven that 90% of cloning attempts fail to produce viable offspring, cloned beings tend to have lame immune functions, higher rates of infection, develop diseases, alter normal human lifespan, and more.Relating to Frankenstein, the novel displays how discrimination and tension would arise in the world if cloning were to take place. Human cloning would tear apart the w orld, and would result in to winning side, just one distraught world, similar to lives of people that were interpreted away by the creature in Frankenstein. Therefore, if Mary Shelley were to live in the present time, today, she would not approve of the scientific practice of cloning. The beneficial evidences that are believed in the practice of cloning can not overcome how smuggled the world would become if science were to take use of cloning.