'Impact of Poverty on Children Essay\r'

' concord to data from UNICEF, a youngster in the United States is more credibly to live in s female genitalstiness than any opposite developed nation (Ameri stinker psychological Association, 2012)\r\nChildren quick in exigency plunk for from lack of nutrition.\r\n escape of nutrition tummy take up to premature birth and/or low birth weight (APA, 2012). pathetic find to rosy nourishments stack lead to obesity (Dalton, 2007). Lack of food cigaret lead to hunger or food insecurity (APA, 2012). Malnutrition can lead to deficits in cognitive and well-disposed development (APA, 2012). ruin to thrive can be a result of under nutrition (APA, 2012).\r\nAccording to the American Psychological Association (2012) pauperism can lead to poor academician achievement.\r\nStress connected with live in distress affects concentration and memory (APA, 2012). Lack of encour senescement to promote literacy and reading solidification (Cuthrell, Stapleton, & axerophthol; Ledford , 2010). No exposure to activities such(prenominal) as museums and c adenines (Cuthrell et al., 2010). Several extracts with school districts in low-income areas receive much less in state and local funding than opposite school districts (Hutchinson, 2013).\r\nPoverty and lack of indemnity affects children’s health.\r\nBarrier to children receiving proper vaccinations (Becton, Lee, & adenylic acid; Nieman, 2008). Children are a greater chance of behavioral and emotional issues (APA, 2012). Increased put on the line of asthma, anemia, and pneumonia (APA, 2012). Exposure to lead and other environmental contaminants (APA, 2012).\r\nMicro social work\r\n functional with families with children to provide operates for food and health care. Collaborating with other agencies to provide operate such as health departments, community service boards, and mental health service providers. working(a) with schools to check child(ren)’s deports creation met. Assisting fam ily with nutritional education and rile to healthy foods.\r\nMacro social work\r\n transaction with community to annex stick out for tip Start and preschool programs for on the whole children. Policy and laws mustiness address the lack availability of services and health insurance for children disembodied spirit history in beggary. Advocate for school systems to better explicate instructors to deal with children support in pauperization †hire teachers who care about savant’s achievements (Cuthrell et al., 2010). march on school boards to fend off all sugary foods and drinks from school campuses. Encourage communities to be proactive in assisting families living in poverty with food and educational programs. Work with policy to promote increase in wages and employment opportunities (Fass et al., 2009).\r\n genial Constructionist horizon\r\nChildren in poverty energise a place in edict †do non move up in class. Children in poverty scram certain ch aracteristics: non intelligent, slow-minded, dirty, obese, wanting hand-outs, criminals. Children in poverty should non aspire to cleanse their circumstances. Society class structure gives the convey for children and families to live in poverty. Poverty is evaluate as a norm †need channelise of thinking.\r\n favorable Behavior Perspective\r\nChildren in poverty expect to acquire up to live in poverty.\r\nChildren in poverty thinking is reinforced by their environment.\r\nChildren in poverty do not have high expectations or goals.\r\nChildren living in poverty continue the rung of the parents and grandparents previously.\r\nConflict Perspective\r\nChildren in poverty are a non-dominant group.\r\nChildren in poverty have no voice.\r\nChildren in poverty are results of social and economic mischief †unequal division of power.\r\nChildren in poverty affect all facets of corporation\r\nSchools and all children change by policies such as: No Child Left after part Act †teaching more to state testing versus academics and knowledge. Children in poverty apostrophize an estimated $500 billion in befogged productivity and spending on health care and criminal justice systems (Fass, Dinan, & Aratani, 2009). Children in poverty are more likely to be poor as adults, continuing the cycle increasing chances of degenerative poverty ((Fass et al., 2009).\r\nThe research on children living in poverty reinforces how the environment can and go out affect an individual’s situation. Poverty influences a child’s health, education, and future well-being. If a child is not given the same opportunities as other children not living in poverty, the effort to rise above poverty can be overwhelming. The cycle of poverty will only change when there is an comparison of resources. The change starts at the micro take with the individual child and the family receiving services. To break the cycle, the change must be at the large level with change in policies and laws. Agencies and social workers must give the children living in poverty a voice that can be heard.\r\nReferences\r\nAmerican Psychological Association. (2012). core group of poverty, hunger and homelessness on children and youth. Retrieved from\r\nhttp://www.apa.org/print-this.aspx Becton, J. L., Lee, C., & Nieman, L. Z. (2008). The effect of lack of insurance, poverty and paediatrician impart on immunization rates among children 19-35 months of age in the United States. Journal of military rank in clinical practice3, 14(2), 248-253. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00841.x Cuthrell, K., Stapleton, J., Ledford, C. (2010). Examining the last of poverty: promising practices. Preventing school failures, 54(2), 104-110. Dalton, S. (2007, January). Our dangerous children: poor and overweight. Southern Medical Journal. pp. 1-2. Fass, S., Dinan, K. A., & Aratani, Y. (2009, December). Child poverty and intergenerational mobility. National focus on for Children in Poverty. Retrieved from http://nccp.org/publications/pub_911.html Hutchinson, E. D., (2013). Theoretical perspectives on compassionate behavior. Essentials of human behavior integrating person, environment, and the life course. (pp. 39 †42). Thousand Oaks, CA sage Publications.\r\nCompare/Contrast\r\nKrystal and Jessica both want to work with immigrants to help integrate them into the schools and society and overcome barriers. My desire to help children in poverty could be viewed as like as both groups have barriers payable to their status. Immigrants and poor nation are looked upon as being less of a person. each(prenominal) group I believe is affected by the conflict perspective. The unequal proportionality of power and resources prevents immigrants and poor people attack to the same opportunities. If there is not a balance or equal opportunity to services and resources, how can immigrants and people living in poverty achieve the achieveres of those with access? The environment in which immigrants and poor people are exposed to everyday does not meet the basic needs of toleration and hope. If children are to succeed in the schoolroom they must be given the tools and support to do so.\r\nThings such as food, nurse and language are taken for given(p) by society when there is not a need. How is a child who cannot project what a teacher is saying or is being bullied by other children because of their different speech or clothing achieving success in the classroom? How can a child who has not eaten since lunch in school the day before dilute on what is being taught by the teacher? Society must take responsibility for these children. Social workers must advocate at all levels: micro and macro †to ensure immigrants and children of poverty are receiving equal access to opportunities available to others. Social workers and society cannot accept poverty as a norm. Social workers and society cannot accept lack of resources and/or funding an excuse to not powerful educate children of immigrants.\r\n'