The Allais effect -- Changing our views on gravity and how it works.

In 1954 Maurice Allais, a French economist who would go on to learn the Nobel prize, decided to observe and record the movements of a pendulum everywhere a period of 30 days. Simultaneously, during one of his observations, a solar bulk boast copiousy took place. Just as the moon passed surrounded by the sun and the earth, the pendulum began sorrowful faster that expected. Now known as the Allais effect, it contradicts Einsteins theory of usual theory of relativity - The modern write up of how sombreness works. This affect is so small, however, that it would take about a day for the apple to pass away from a channelize if it were the only gravitational effect acting upon it. Ironically, the observations taken during a solar eclipse established superior general Relativity in the send-off place. Therefore, many scientists have time-tested to reproduce Allais experiment. The results werent equal, however, causing this to be an even bigger mystery. Most bills b reak through to have an effect too miniscule to be a major part of this phenomenon. It is still a possibility, however, that Einsteins theory of general Relativity is wrong. There are still a hardly a(prenominal) explanations, nevertheless, that take in charge to explain the Allais effect. The first explanation is called Majorana. This theory states that large masses partially freeze out the gravitational force from to a greater extent deep objects. If this is correct, the moon can partially be city mob the gravitational effects of the sun from reaching the earth. Another explanation is called MOND (short for modify Newtonian Dynamics) which suggests that at extremely low accelerations, sombreness aches middling stronger. An even stranger theory is that the force of gravity is antithetic at different directions. Most physicists dislike that one.

It uses the concept of frames of reference, in which movement, acceleration, and so on are not resembling in all directions. But it... forgot to add this (bibliography): Economist, The. An invisible extend?. 19 Aug 2004. Economist.com. The Economist. 20 Aug 2004 <http://www.economist.com/science/PrinterFr iendly.cfm?Story_ID=3104321>. thank for including the bibliography - as I always say, its nice to know where you get your culture from & helps prevent plagiarism on the site. This demonstrate was very helpful. If you want to get a full essay, format it on our website: OrderCustomPap er.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper